难兄难弟

新时代文明实践 | 钱清街道开展“与梦想童行”中国梦想日主题活动_我的网站

一 | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。 DREAM 与梦想童行中国梦想日主题活动梦想是人生的起点和宝藏梦想是对未来生活的寄托在中国梦想日来临之际 12月25日上午钱清街道新时代文明实践所开展 “与梦想童行”中国梦想日主题活动让孩子们在课堂和手工中理解梦想的重要性鼓励他们树立远大的理想和坚定的人生目标希望每个孩子都能明白 “人人皆可书写梦想，创造未来!” 01 亚运梦中国梦大家都怀藏着怎样的梦想呢？绍兴文理学院元培学院的毛勇玲老师通过分享自己作为亚运志愿者的经历，带领孩子们更加深入地了解亚运会中“中国梦”的展现。亚运梦·中国梦毛勇玲老师还鼓励孩子们要珍惜时光，勤奋学习，为实现“中国梦”贡献自己的一份力量。

二 | 这次的生动分享不仅让小朋友们感受到了亚运会各个环节中所散发出的中国力量，也点燃了他们为自己的梦想而努力奋斗的决心。

三 | 02 点亮科学火种你知道吗？早期红军由于装备落后，没有太多大功率的电台，电力需求不大，因此会使用简易的手摇发电机来解决用电问题。这些在现如今看来相当简陋，但对于当时的红军和八路军来说，它们却是比生命还重要的“宝贝”… 灯泡手摇发电机DIY 电动机是靠电能转化成动能使电动机转动，那么电动机转动，可以产生电吗？让我们一起在实践中探个究竟！实践所的志愿者为孩子们发放了材料包，大家对材料包内的元件充满好奇，快速的拆卸着材料板上的小零件。

四 | 在志愿者耐心的手把手教学下，大家的手摇发电机陆陆续续的成功发电了。率先制作成功的孩子变身小老师，帮助和指导其他小伙伴一起制作。当转动摇把，电灯泡亮起来的时候，小朋友们的眼中充满了成就感！ 03 童心绘梦成长大家都有些什么梦想呢？我想当老师！我要漫步太空！每个人都会有自己的梦想，而对于孩子们来说，他们的梦想更是千姿百态。

五 | 无论是成为医生、科学家、运动员，还是考试满分、探索太空，实际上都是对未来生活的美好向往和对自我价值的追求。这些心中的梦想，孩子们有“画”说！他们用画笔绘画出自己心中对生活的热爱。孩子们在横幅上尽情地挥洒着他们的想象力，无论是简单的线条还是复杂的色彩，都展现出孩子们无穷的创作灵感。他们用画笔诠释着梦想，用色彩温暖着生活。